“Lessons from Luke: The Rich Ruler”
Luke 18: 18 – 30
Christopher H. Edmonston
Howard Memorial Presbyterian Church,
I.
Four weeks ago we began a journey into Luke’s gospel to see what he meant by rich and poor. We began on an earnest search for the Lenten lessons that Luke had to teach us; we agreed in these sermons to do our best to give Luke an honest hearing about the pitfalls and pratfalls of wealth, and the easy seduction of money that tells us that it is the elixir of happiness and the antidote to emptiness; we said we would take the plunge as a wealthier congregation and offer ourselves unto the word to discover anew our sinfulness and Christ’s redemption.
Thus far our train has stopped in some difficult places, and I am quite sure that there have been at least a few of us who’d rather not have gotten off the places that we have been – places where we have heard Jesus say things like: “Woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation;” and, “One cannot serve two masters – You cannot serve God and money.”
Today we arrive at a place where we have already been before, as several months ago, I preached around this text – meaning I read it but took a different direction than where I am going today (I preached it through the looking glass of ‘salvation’ instead of ‘wealth’). A few of you came up to me and wanted to know what Jesus meant by that statement about “a camel getting through a needle’s eye.” I asked those of you who said something to be patient (that I would get to it) and today I make good on that promise.
II.
Earlier
this week I was in
One of the observations that we shared was that the stakes are so high here in Luke 18. This is not a parable; there is no metaphor or symbolism here. There are no abstractions to be found. One man, a ruler Luke calls him, and Jesus standing face to face – virtually no distance between them, between us (if we dare to put ourselves in the place of the man) and God. Jesus is as close as we can get him here. And this up close and personal Jesus is calling upon him (and us) to make a choice.
Bob shared with me that old Jack Benny joke about the robber who approached the rich man with gun in hand. The robber mashes the gun in the ribs of the guy he is robbing and says, “Your money or your life.” Several, if not many, moments pass with the tension mounting with every tick of the watch. Impatient the robber presses the metal harder against his flesh and says, “Well?” The man replies, “I’m thinking! I’m thinking!”[1]
III.
One of the films that gets a lot of play at my house is a movie that came out about 4 years ago called The Family Man. It is an update of It’s a Wonderful Life, and while not as good as the Jimmy Stewart film, it is still a film that powerfully questions modern life and modern assumptions about value, wealth, family, and the deepest meanings of life.
Jack, the main character, is wealthy beyond all imagination. He has closets full of suits; a six-figure sports car; he lives in a Manhattan penthouse; dates supermodels; he is wealthy and powerful – a ruler on Wall Street because he is a buyer of main street. We meet Jack as he has just called a meeting for the pawns that do his bidding – a meeting on Christmas morning.
As Jack leaves the office, he intercedes in a robbery of sorts – maybe best described as an urban confrontation. In this confrontation, Jack meets an angel. The angel at one point asks him coldly, “Well Jack, what do you need?” Without thinking Jack answers, “I don’t need anything.”
Luke calls him a “ruler,” using the Greek word archon to describe him (Matthew and Mark don’t describe him like this). In the New Testament, archon is a powerful word (wherever we find it, Luke is trying to tell us something) – we get words like archbishop and archangel from the word. In Luke he is not only very rich, but he is powerful (Luke seems to know the connection between power and money). Strangely enough, the ruler’s question is a contradiction of sorts:[2] “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” By definition one does nothing to inherit – inheritance comes by the grace of the progenitor; the generosity of one with the power to give.
Perhaps that is why Jesus answers his question a little differently than he asks it. For Jesus, in responding to the man’s question, the answer is not eternal life (which is the ruler’s question), but participating in the kingdom. There is a difference here in Luke between kingdom and eternal life (the words are even different in the Greek), and for Christians then and now. What Jesus is doing here is setting up an understanding of faith and life in which both heaven and earth are of crucial concern and divine importance. Notice Jesus’ phrase: “It is easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than one who is rich to enter the kingdom.” Notice that the phrase was not “easier for a camel to pass than for a rich one to have eternal life.”
Notice also that in the final verse of our selection, Luke 18:30, Jesus wonderfully joins the two together – “There is no one who sacrificially gives for my sake that will not receive much more in this age, AND in the life to come” – the issue for Jesus is both the earthly kingdom that he has come to construct and the heavenly life that he is assuring for those he calls his own. We want to make it one or the other – Jesus thinks that discipleship is about both.
V.
The point, Jesus is making is that for those who have much – much comfort, much money, much security, much control – entering the kingdom of grace, the community of loving discipleship is very difficult – almost impossible. To be sure the temptation is to water this down – to say that somehow Jesus means something different here than he really means – but that would be a mistake. It’s really a camel. It’s really a needle. It is meant to be impossible. Preacher and scholar alike have agreed that the hyperbole here is meant to get our attention. We are supposed to be shocked. [3]
Jesus’ point is that if we are holding onto anything save the grace and calling of God in our lives, then we are not going to make it into the kingdom – that kingdom, that entity that he has been proclaiming and preaching about for 18 chapters now in Luke’s narrative. What is the kingdom (it’s different than heaven after all)? The kingdom is that place of community where there is sharing; it is an end of loneliness; an end of comparison and ‘keeping up with the Jones’s’; it’s a place where everyone is heard and hears; where there is no weeping or mourning alone; where the hungry eat and the empty are filled; where the Spirit is real and the good gifts of God are abundantly shared; the kingdom that Jesus proclaims is the here and now place of grace; the place that we all long to live and the community that beckons us all.
The seduction of money, Jesus says, gets us off track and makes us think that wealth, and not God’s Spirit of Grace and Life, can carve out a kingdom life for us. Jesus is saying that it is not possible for our wealth alone to make for us a kingdom life. I stand before you today as a student of Jesus, and as a man who struggles with this tension. I stand before you as a student of scripture and a disciple of Jesus to say humbly that I am convinced (even though I don’t always live like it) that the grace of Jesus Christ is more beautiful than any bank account, any lifestyle, or any luxury that we can imagine.
VI.
Where the ruler gets it wrong is that he thinks that this teaching of Jesus is yet another Torah-like demand, another requirement of the law; all the while Jesus is transcending the law itself – not supplanting it or replacing it – but offering grace abundant that goes beyond what the ruler can imagine.[4] Jesus’ word to him is not so much judgment as it is bidding to a new life in this kingdom that he is proclaiming and demonstrating. The only sacrifice the man must make is the life that he has known.
Only?!?! That seems like a great deal. It would scare me to great ends. But, one wonders (and here is where this text cuts, and it cuts more than one way), if the life that the man returns to by rejecting the invitation of the Lord, the life that his wealth had provided for him was so wonderful and satisfying in the first place, then why did he seek Jesus out and ask his question? If he was satisfied and justified, just as he was, then why look for something different or something new?
When he walks away, the deception of wealth is complete. The sad truth is not that the man is lacking something – we all lack something in our lives – it is that in the very presence of God he cannot hold onto the one thing he lacks because of the grip that he holds upon something else. And, quite truthfully, because of the grip that wealth has upon him.
VII.
The question then is not really about salvation – it is about fullness of life in Christ and the joy that only God can and does provide. To get this life, to receive the kingdom in our lives requires a much greater sacrifice than most of us are willing to make. It requires that we give up some control. For as long as we believe that we can control our lives, our worlds, our spheres of influence we are each in some form practicing an idolatry. That is really the sin of the ruler – the wealth he controls, he believes, is evidence of God and has for him become God. When we choose an idol over the God of heaven and earth we errantly believe that we control God. This ruler has not chosen to serve two masters -- he has chosen his master, his wealth, and he has chosen poorly.
IX.
Most
ministers I know, and I am no different, can tell a tragic and terrible story
about someone who has realized the error of this choice. Who has assumed that they could think,
maneuver, force, or buy their way out of any situation and have years assuring
that type of control and power – only to have all they have built slip through
their fingers like water when confronted with the pain of life, or the reality
of death. They realize too late the deception
that has taken them, and they understand painfully that there really is no
choice between money and life, between earthly wealth and heavenly grace,
between riches and the
The writer Rudyard Kipling addressing a graduating class advised the graduates not to care too much for money, or power, or fame. He said, “Someday you will meet a [person] who cares for none of these things – then you will know how poor you are.”[6]
This
is what happened to the ruler – he met that someone who cared for none of that
stuff in the person of Jesus. One
wonders how it will happen to us.
Your money or your life? Which will it be?: wealth and idolatry or the infinite joys of the kingdom of grace, which is as close to heaven as we will get on earth?
What do we really need? Dare we say we need nothing while falling at the feet of Jesus? Which one will it be – more of the stuff of this world, or more of the life of God in our lives?
May God
grant us the ability to see the call to kingdom as not just another requirement
of the faith but as an opportunity to be freed from the captivity of this world
and an invitation to begin living like we belong and are part of the next. Amen.
[1] Conversation with Bob Dunham – also cited in a Dunham sermon from September 2001, The Strange Melancholy of Abundance.
[2] Fred Craddock. Luke. Page 213. His work here is exemplary (pages 212-214).
[3] Luke Timothy Johnson. Luke. Page 278.
[4] Johnson. 281.
[5] Craddock, 214.
[6] As cited
by Dale Turner,